ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The study aims to isolate and understand cytopathogenesis, ultrastructure, genomic characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 virus of B.1.210 lineage, that circulated in India during first wave of the pandemic. METHODS: Clinical specimen from an interstate traveller from Maharashtra to Karnataka, in May 2020, who was positive by RT PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection was subjected to virus isolation and Whole Genome Sequencing. Vero cells were used to study cytopathogenesis and ultrastructural features by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Phylogenetic analysis of the whole genome sequences of several SARS-CoV-2 variants downloaded from GISAID was performed in comparison with the B.1.210 variant identified in this study. RESULTS: The virus was isolated in Vero cells and identified by immunofluorescence assay and RT PCR. The growth kinetics in infected Vero cells revealed a peak viral titre at 24 âh post-infection. Ultrastructural studies revealed distinct morphological changes with accumulation of membrane-bound vesicles containing pleomorphic virions in the cytoplasm, with single or multiple intranuclear filamentous inclusions and dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum with viral particles. Whole genome sequence of the clinical specimen as well as the isolated virus revealed the virus to be of lineage B.1.210 with the D614G mutation in the spike protein. Phylogenetic analysis of the whole genome sequence in comparison with other variants reported globally revealed that the isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus of lineage B.1.210 is closely related to the original Wuhan virus reference sequence. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.210 virus isolated here showed ultrastructural features and cytopathogenesis similar to that of the virus reported during early phase of pandemic. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolated virus is closely related to the original Wuhan virus, thereby suggesting that the SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.210 that was circulating in India during the early phase of pandemic is likely to have evolved from the original Wuhan strain.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Chlorocebus aethiops , Animals , Pandemics , Phylogeny , Vero Cells , India , GenomicsABSTRACT
Late in 2020, two genetically-distinct clusters of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with mutations of biological concern were reported, one in the United Kingdom and one in South Africa. Using a combination of data from routine surveillance, genomic sequencing and international travel we track the international dispersal of lineages B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 (variant 501Y-V2). We account for potential biases in genomic surveillance efforts by including passenger volumes from location of where the lineage was first reported, London and South Africa respectively. Using the software tool grinch (global report investigating novel coronavirus haplotypes), we track the international spread of lineages of concern with automated daily reports, Further, we have built a custom tracking website (cov-lineages.org/global_report.html) which hosts this daily report and will continue to include novel SARS-CoV-2 lineages of concern as they are detected.
ABSTRACT
Karnataka, a state in south India, reported its first case of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on March 8, 2020, more than a month after the first case was reported in India. We used a combination of contact tracing and genomic epidemiology to trace the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the state up until May 21, 2020 (1578 cases). We obtained 91 genomes of SARS-CoV-2 which clustered into seven lineages (Pangolin lineages-A, B, B.1, B.1.80, B.1.1, B.4, and B.6). The lineages in Karnataka were known to be circulating in China, Southeast Asia, Iran, Europe and other parts of India and are likely to have been imported into the state both by international and domestic travel. Our sequences grouped into 17 contact clusters and 24 cases with no known contacts. We found 14 of the 17 contact clusters had a single lineage of the virus, consistent with multiple introductions and most (12/17) were contained within a single district, reflecting local spread. In most of the 17 clusters, the index case (12/17) and spreaders (11/17) were symptomatic. Of the 91 sequences, 47 belonged to the B.6 lineage, including eleven of 24 cases with no known contact, indicating ongoing transmission of this lineage in the state. Genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Karnataka suggests multiple introductions of the virus followed by local transmission in parallel with ongoing viral evolution. This is the first study from India combining genomic data with epidemiological information emphasizing the need for an integrated approach to outbreak response.